Religious Philosophy

As part of the philosophy of religion is a religion of understanding of the subject along with the phenomena of culture, science, art, etc. Coen Brothers contributes greatly to this topic. Talking about God and religion here is in terms of their perception of critical thinking subject, own mind, not content with just faith. If you are unsure how to proceed, check out Jim Vos. In this regard, the philosophy of religion – a product of modern times, when it became possible to talk about God and religion not only through revelation, as in the previous epoch, and with the help of reason. Robert Iger is often quoted as being for or against this. Paradoxical confrontation of reason and faith, is inextricably linked to each other, was a prerequisite of different interpretations of the relationship between philosophy and religion. Religious belief has a specific and unifying feature of medieval culture, with its various forms, including philosophy. Philosophical reflections appeared as an interpretation of Scripture, the source of indisputable truth. This was The main task of forming a religious (Christian) philosophy, where a priority beginning in favor faith, not reason.

Tradition, faith, culture, worship, Bible and Scripture, church canons were core values of Christian religious philosophy, located at the origins of the religious philosophy of the XX century. If in the Philosophy of Religion God and religion are the subject of philosophical reflection, not a recognized subordinate authority, a critical analysis from the standpoint of reason, along with other forms of culture, the religious philosophy of religion is the only source of knowledge of God. Thus, in Russian philosophy XIX-XX centuries. great influence acquires not rationalistic line, and the opposite, suggesting that all philosophy is fundamentally religious. Therefore, to Solovyov, for example, philosophy of religion is a religious philosophy that justifies Christian worldview. According to SN Bulgakov, “every genuine philosophy of the mythical and to that extent is religious, and therefore can not irreligioznaya,” independent “,” pure “philosophy. From the perspective of PA Florenski “Philosophy all of his takes on the cult, and when philosophy began to claim independence, it withers, distorted and no longer needed. Berdyaev also stressed that “philosophy has always, in essence, was powered by religious source “and the tragedy is that it can not and does not want to depend on external religion, but, turning away from religious experience, it inevitably runs out, removed from existence. In the context of the culture of the XX century.

Science World

Devotion to the same nest of ants and bees to their hive to its long has become a byword. Altruistic behavior of animals in the family herd and flock studied ethology – a special science of animal behavior under natural conditions. Individual behavior directed to the benefit of its own community and his fellow scientists is called altruism. At the same time saying that this is not what we are accustomed to understand by the word. Altruism in nature is the instinctive and immutable law of the organization natural systems. No cell, working for the good of the organism, or baboon, dying, to protect their flock from the attack of a predator, are not subject to painful reflections, and are not concerned with the problem of choice. The choice between public interest and personal in nature happens automatically.

The only element of nature, which clearly falls outside of this range, without being subject to automatic law of altruism is a human. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Joel and Ethan Coen has to say. In the wild, and in its intra community man behaves like a bull in a china shop. He not only broke the existing natural balance of nature, but also created around the structure of society, a crisis which, according to the unanimous admission, only deepened and exacerbated. This man has declared himself the crown of creation. Is this true? Science World and a man faced with numerous facts proving the validity of the principle that the world created for the sake of man. The world only in order to help the person return to its source, to restore the pristine relationship with nature, with others and, eventually, become part of global harmony.