The globalization: The good or the evil of the century? Thinking on our current moment, our great globalization Many images had come, many feelings had appeared, and after a time reflecting on this question, appeared this text. Reflecting on where moment we find in them, what we wait, and what we are considered to be and not to have? Difficult word this To be! As to be in the world where each time more little people are being, and yes surviving. To be according to Michaelis dictionary means: Being; Human being; Existence, life; Thing that has reality in the world of the directions. Figure, form; state, way to exist. sm pl the nature; everything how much it exists; the set of the creatures. To be real: the same that real being. To be of reason: the same that reason being.
To be supreme: the same that supreme Being. This being that experience the life existing, that it usufructs of its directions, is each scarcer time. What we see daily people are beating ' ' ponto' ' of the life, as in a company where the people they beat the point daily of the entrance and of exit of the work. This form to survive more goes leaving the people each time ' ' enlatadas' ' , ' ' engolindo' ' the form world not to see itself, not to be felt. Foods in the literal form eats each time more fast as in such a way metafrica, wants each time more, without the least to stop to ask themselves if need, or if really its will is that one. Or it will be that one more time the people are ' ' engolindo' ' that, that is, possessing that, without being what they really want to be. He will be that it is to have that toy, thinking about the children, or to have that clothes, or even though to have that car that goes to make the person if to feel happy? Since this is the word key, where if vende each time more the celebrities ' ' pills of felicidade' '.
This term passes for an evolution semantics in elapsing of History. Therefore, the history of the euthanasia if divides at three times: Ritualizada euthanasia (Greco-roman period): ritualizao of the death as one of the great events of the existence human being. Medicalizada euthanasia: from Francis Bacon (1561-1626), the term gains new a sensible one to give attention in as the patient can leave the life in more easy way, an adequate treatment to the incurable illnesses. Independent euthanasia: to break postwar period, it is the current situation of the debate on euthanasia, where the quarrels if center in the right of the patients of will decide on its to die and to not the prolongation of its suffering. Frequently CBS has said that publicly. Different of the two previous ones, where the desire of the patient was always in second plain, submitted> social reasons, politicians, doctors, eugenic, etc. , this last period is based on the beginning of the autonomy, the respect to the rights of the patients to its proper death, in the conscience of its imminence (PESSINI and BARCHIFONTAINE, 1997). Technical, euthanasia if relates to the act of a doctor finally to the life of a terminal patient the order of the same, in this in case that an active, positive, direct euthanasia, also call of merciful death or attended suicide. Passive, negative, indirect euthanasia, consists of the omission or not-application of a medical therapy that it would make possible to draw out the life of the patient, without life hopes. Differently, the distansia (of the Greek dis, me, suffered and penosa death) is the situation where the medical action, pautando itself unilaterally in the prolongation of the life, consists of a therapeutical stubbornness, delaying in way irrational the death process, in a ftil treatment, where only> it would cause a painful and laborious process of dying (MOSER AND TO SOUND, 2006; PESSINI AND BARCHIFONTAINE, 1997).