Menezes Castro One

Saulo Menezes Castro poet of the integration with natureza, science without calculations and the philosophy without teses and theories. Poet doenvolvimento and of the dance with atoms, poet of the fusing of the man I obtain exactly, of the individuality, the conscience to exist and the integration with ouniverso.The man is only one small part, an only member of this universal corpoinfinito and. Saulo Menezes Castro is a holistic poet, this idea deintegrao with the universe is not a concept of the philosophy or dapsicomotricidade, in the aboriginal, Asian, African culture in others culturasque is not this that is basically Christianity and capitalism, holsticasempre existed. The indians are an example of this idea of integration, its deusesda tree, its deuses of rain, its deuses of the animals etc, always foramvistos for the Christian culture as nonsenses, ignorance etc. Now that estamosrumo to the one ambient catastrophe, we can affirm that the culture of the indian is anossa probable salvation but, not it Christianity that was tax and continuasendo tax, with the same arrogance of the time of the settling.

It does not have maisespao for the impositions, the way for the humanity, now with democratizaodo knowledge, is the cultural and religious sincretismo. The aboriginal culture is asalvao of the humanity because this culture sees the man with an integrated being anatureza, very different of our Christian capitalist culture that always it saw to oser human with the greater and more perfect creation of God. Deuses in all ascoisas that we see in many other cultures, gave to these peoples umrespeito the nature, who we are not nor itself wants capable to understand. Essesdeuses in everything of these cultures is the gnomos and the elementais of the culturaesotrica. The holistic one can save the world. The sincretismo that very does not gostamnem itself wants to hear to speak is the most likely way, now that we live the age dainformao, of the multiculturalismo and of the globalismo, the regionalism can serpreservado, however it is not possible to dam the knowledge, because conhecimentoanda with the man, and this virtual man is one andarilho universal. Gnosemoderna of Samael Aun Weor is the biggest example of integration of the man with omundo, of the man with I follow exactly and with the universal culture.

the individuality dohomem and of the nature it is preserved when we see the man with a member of a corpouniversal. In our bodies we have our individuality, we do not confuse amos with the ears, the feet with the nose, each member of our body has the suaindividualidade preserved for the instinct and our conscience to exist. Amaneira as we are organized is that it becomes possible in them we recognize comoseres human, and our dependence of the o world that in the fence is that permitereconhecer in them that we are beings integrated with the nature. The multicuturalismo is umfator importantissimo so that it can have a intendimento between the peoples domundo, the imposition of some symbols of a culture determined in one espaoonde is frequented by individuals of the most varied cultures, is one desrespeitoa this freedom to know, of if informing, of if to integrate the culturauniversal. The multiculturalizado individual extends its capacity of compreensode itself exactly as man integrated to the universe and individual with preserved algumasindependncias.

Customer Proximity

Kundenfokussiert how you staff lead process orientation, efficiency, cost saving: in the boardrooms has more with himself than with customers. The managers stick to numbers rather than to talk to customers. The staff into the tank of standards and norms. Before louder management remains the humanity on the line. And the customers flee in a panic. The joy of change is so great as never and in most cases homemade.

When the ruling elite loses the reference to the base and to the customer, creates a customer-hostile corporate culture that ensures employees on the front line necessarily, proximity to the customer is lost. A development fatal for any business, because the power relationship has irreversibly in favor of customers changed. Rather than to lull the customer on one side and them forced it to press, what keeps the company for good and right, it applies now to organize internal processes as well as the marketing and distribution together with the customers. The faithful stupid customer was yesterday. Who today does not play according to the rules of the customers, tomorrow no longer plays.

The customer is the real boss. Therefore, so is the conclusion by Anne M. Schuller, management consultant and an expert in loyalty marketing, belongs to the customer in the boardroom and at the Board table. And that is why companies need a new style of leadership: the customer-focused leadership. In her book, the author puts customers uncompromisingly in the focus of all business activities. Like the new ‘ paradoxical customer is ticking, as managers become people shipping posts, what framework allow a company-wide focus on customers, can be enabled like the skills and in particular the desire to the employees,: the book gives the answers. Sometimes provocative, always motivating and relevant practice it shows step by step, how a customer-oriented management and a customer-focused leadership can be implemented. To the author gives executives a rich Toolbox in hand. Numerous checklists and practical examples complete the work. A must’ on the desktop all those your company want to make fit for the future. The author Anne M. Schuller is a management consultant and considered to be the leading expert for loyalty marketing. She has worked over 20 years in senior sales and marketing positions of various service sectors and several awards. The diploma in business administration and eight-time book author has taught at several universities. It belongs to the best business speakers in German-speaking countries.

Florbela Espanca

However, the feminine voice already starts to be divulged and to be unchained of the mooring cables arrested that it. The masculine censorship that tries to silence the feminine voice seems is being insult. Palliative, but already it is an evolution. In accordance with Yourcenar (1980, P. 22) is said: As all people, I only make use of three half ones to evaluate the existence human being: most dangerous, but also most fruitful the study of us proper, most difficult and of the methods: the comment of the men, who for the most part of cases make everything stop in them hiding its secrets and of convincing in them they have that them; the books, with particular errors of perspective that is born between the lines. The alternation of papers can already represent an advance in the feminine emancipation. Before, the woman alone was disclosed as somebody of who if she speaks before thus treated literature and in the society. Today object place is located and spoken of the man giving to it and not only of citizen.

Some writers of last centuries as Florbela Espanca, Marguerite Duras and Safo already despertavam for this feminine dissatisfaction that if materialized in the inhibition of its voice practised for the imposition of the man. This dissatisfaction instigated the woman to produce literary texts with more frequency, with focus in its mysteries and its necessity to display in the society its dignity and its importance, intuindo if to undo of censorship centuries estigmatizaram that them estigmatizam and them. On the difficulties faced for the woman, Woof (1996, p.49) salient: ' ' In the truth I believe that still it will pass a long time before a woman can seat to write a book without finding a ghost to be assassinated, a rock stops to be golpeada.' ' This assertive exemplifica a machista society and propayer of an oligarchy.