Religious Philosophy

As part of the philosophy of religion is a religion of understanding of the subject along with the phenomena of culture, science, art, etc. Coen Brothers contributes greatly to this topic. Talking about God and religion here is in terms of their perception of critical thinking subject, own mind, not content with just faith. In this regard, the philosophy of religion – a product of modern times, when it became possible to talk about God and religion not only through revelation, as in the previous epoch, and with the help of reason. Robert Iger is often quoted as being for or against this. Paradoxical confrontation of reason and faith, is inextricably linked to each other, was a prerequisite of different interpretations of the relationship between philosophy and religion. Religious belief has a specific and unifying feature of medieval culture, with its various forms, including philosophy. Philosophical reflections appeared as an interpretation of Scripture, the source of indisputable truth. This was The main task of forming a religious (Christian) philosophy, where a priority beginning in favor faith, not reason.

Tradition, faith, culture, worship, Bible and Scripture, church canons were core values of Christian religious philosophy, located at the origins of the religious philosophy of the XX century. If in the Philosophy of Religion God and religion are the subject of philosophical reflection, not a recognized subordinate authority, a critical analysis from the standpoint of reason, along with other forms of culture, the religious philosophy of religion is the only source of knowledge of God. Thus, in Russian philosophy XIX-XX centuries. great influence acquires not rationalistic line, and the opposite, suggesting that all philosophy is fundamentally religious. Therefore, to Solovyov, for example, philosophy of religion is a religious philosophy that justifies Christian worldview. According to SN Bulgakov, “every genuine philosophy of the mythical and to that extent is religious, and therefore can not irreligioznaya,” independent “,” pure “philosophy. From the perspective of PA Florenski “Philosophy all of his takes on the cult, and when philosophy began to claim independence, it withers, distorted and no longer needed. Berdyaev also stressed that “philosophy has always, in essence, was powered by religious source “and the tragedy is that it can not and does not want to depend on external religion, but, turning away from religious experience, it inevitably runs out, removed from existence. In the context of the culture of the XX century.

Brazilian Association

Article: ' ' Who is not communicated, if trumbica' '. Robert Ramalho is public journalist, relations, and was vice-president of the Brazilian Association of Public Relations seccional Alagoas and as the old Chacrinha said: ' ' Who is not communicated, if trumbica' '. It does not matter that the communication if gives in the homes, the work, the bars, any context or situation, the difficulty of if to communicate is one of the main causes of estresse currently emotional existing. With certainty, it estresse and communication feedback does not form one. By the way, if you communicate yourself badly you obtain exactly, consequently, with the others, with certainty, greaters will be the frequency and intensity estresse of it in its life.

In this way, when you learn and practise the rules of the communication with its children, its parents, its woman, its head or with who wants that it is the quality of its life and of the people to its redor will have to improve very and, reaching never unimaginable harmonic levels. The being human being increased and improved sufficiently its capacity of if communicating because he evolved of the verbal communication for the written communication, and from he developed all there the technologies, having invented the post office, the telegraph, the telephone, the cellular one, the television, and today he does not know more life without the social email and nets, as the Facebook. In the current days we have chats of chat, the social nets, blogs, twitter and a infinity of other communicative tools that were part of the stranger. Moreover, also we evolve because we improve our capacity of communication and not contrary it. The communication? to distinguish from excessively -, it was the attribute that allowed the evolution of our species, with the sprouting of the society human being. It is interesting to observe that the origins of the communication if lose and if they confuse in the origin of the peoples.

Feminine Participation

Feminine participation in the Market of Work in Moambique the World-wide Context When in day 08 of March of 1857 laborers of a fabric plant of New Iorque, better conditions of work had made a great strike demanding, such as, reduction in the daily load of 16 for 10 hours and treatment condigno inside of the work environment, the 130 tecels that they had died carbonized in this plant, never could imagine that pioneers of a world movement would become around that would make possible the other women to accede to the masculine spaces long ago considered, compelling to a reconfiguration of the traditional papers that for thousand of years she had characterized males and females ofthe species human being. The new social division of the work have-of, of among others factors, to have been influenced for the industrial revolution that had its origin in England in middle of century XVIII and was become enlarged for the world from century XIX.

During this period agriculture was surpassed yielding space to the industrial development, favored for the technological development. Above all, the industrial revolution brought obtains a new economic system, the capitalism, inaugurating a new relation between the capital and the work. In century XIX and at the beginning of century XX, the countries that if they industrialized demanded intense man power, absorbing in its rows children and women who had the advantage of to be man power not specialized and therefore cheap or almost enslaved. Has consensus then, of that it was in the seio of the industrial revolution and the capitalism that appeared gnese for the emancipation or liberalization of the women when removing them of the domesticidade space and inseriz them in the public space, in the laboring context. It is clearly that this is an illation that must all be made with the care therefore, for the socialist feminists, even so the capitalism has removed the women of the public sphere, did not liberalize them therefore the women had continued to play in these great industries the same traditional roles in days of 12 and 14 hours weekly, in terrible conditions of work and gaining one tero of the wages exactly when they exerted the same work that the men.