The Summit

In the Summit it was to be expected would occur the confrontation between president of Colombia Alvaro Uribe and the one of Venezuela Hugo Chavez It is indicated that the words of Uribe: ” It is man and qudese here and we speak front, because you sometimes insult in distancia” , and ” he vetoes to carajo” that him espet Chvez in answer ran to wide and long it of the tourist complex of Playa del Carmen, in the paradisiac Mexican Mayan Riviera, in which the Summit was celebrated. The incident, between both agent chief executives, took place one more after Uribe appealed to that the Summit served as scene to solve the bilateral problems and would compare the freezing of the commercial relations with Colombia decided by Chvez in 2009 with the blockade that the United States maintains on Cuba.

All this happened while the Chiefs of State advanced in the lighting of a Community of Latin American and Caribbean States that, in words of the Brazilian president, Luiz Incio Lula da Silva, will be ” personalidad” of the region. Learn more at this site: bitcoin. The new regional mechanism that is born with aspirations to still absorb or to integrate – is about to see other regional organisms, at the present time is still the last product in the prolific list of organizations regional and it does not avoid that they are again in the open the enormous differences basic between countries. The Mexican president, Felipe Caldern, ” defended the importance of assuring the unit the region; beyond any difference coyuntural” , but other agent chief executives like the Ecuadorian, Rafael Strap, do not hide that rifirrafes constant between the Andean Governments does not help that process. The Ecuadorian president was indeed one of the protagonists of the previous Summit of the Group of River, in Dominican Republic, dominated on the other crisis: the arisen one after the bombing from Colombian forces to a camping of the guerrilla of the CRAF in Ecuadorian territory with the result of 26 dead people.

Maria Corassin Luiza

In this point we find interesting to give a vision amplified on this obligatory action. An article in the Magazine of History, n 138, So Paulo, July of 1998, Maria Corassin Luiza, of the Department of history of this Magazine, makes an excellent boarding on the Obligatory Charity as being a form of popular pressure in the society delay-old Roman. On the basis of the analysis of the heathen city and the Christian community, if detached two types of givers: the Evrgeta and the Christian. The Evergetismo is a term brother-in-law for the French historian. California hospital medical center may find it difficult to be quoted properly. the Boulanger (1923) and drift of Greek EEPYETW (' ' I make good obras' '). This term indicates the practical one, in the classic world, of luxurious gifts for community of pparently disinterested form. Paul Veyne standed out, in referring to the Evergetismo and the charity, that evrgeta donates for different reasons: to mark its social distinction, for patriotism, civic sense: its gesture dirige it this real world. Evrgeta dirige it the considered people as the set of the citizens.

We also cannot, I tie to subestimar it that, in old Rome, special in the republican period, it was basic reference of the existencial purpose of each one. Beyond the social obligation that evrgeta had stops with the co-citizens, the rhetoric of the Roman people can itself be said that it also was lead for a responsibility sense, on, to basic the republican education, in which the city was an extension of the family and gens. On the other hand, the Christian giver, puts in practical its charity to acquire merit of God ahead: its generosity if dirige to another world. The target of the Christian giver is the poor persons, understood as a social and moral category, not civic. The existence of the poverty in the society Roman led to the despadronizado behavior of the civic actors.